Compared with 17 Python open source projects, and all 107 of GitStats Gallery · the 12 months up to each one’s last commit
Where it is in the top or bottom 15% of these projects.
Of the 3,715,187 lines ever written into scikit-learn's own source, 15% are still there; the rest were rewritten or removed.
2nd lowest of 97; the median project: 37%.
People made 20% as many commits to scikit-learn in the last 12 months as in 2011, its busiest year (984 against 4,913).
13th lowest of 90; the median project made 52% of its busiest year.
scikit-learnPythonothers
Commits in the 12 months up to the last one.
People who made a commit in those 12 months; bots are left out.
Of them, those whose first commit to the project was in those 12 months.
The fewest people whose commits add up to half of those 12 months': how far the work is spread.
Organizations whose addresses committed in those 12 months, by email domain; a domain only one person uses is not one.
The share of the last four quarters' commits that name an AI coding assistant; a lower bound.
Counts sit on a logarithmic scale, so that projects of every size have room; shares on a straight one. A rank is a position among these projects, not a score: more is not better. Every number is in compare.json.